#The curse of la llorona ending explained movie
You can identify a CCU movie pretty easily-so as long as you know what you’re looking for. While there isn’t a Nick Fury–type character setting up an Avengers initiative with holy water and rosary beads, there are some common threads in the CCU that tie these films together, outside of a James Wan producer credit. Perez is the same priest who shows up in the first Annabelle movie, and he recalls to Anna his experience with the possessed doll-if that’s not enough of a hint, the screen briefly flashes Annabelle’s haunting face to remind you we’re in a shared universe. When Anna’s children are subjected to La Llorona’s terror, she enlists the help of a priest, Father Perez (Tony Amendola), which is where the Conjuring tie-in comes in. Following widowed social worker Anna Tate-Garcia (played by Linda Cardellini), who is raising two kids in Los Angeles, La Llorona focuses on the Mexican folklore of the “Weeping Woman”: the ghost of a woman who drowned her children in a river, and whose spirit now haunts and kills other kids.
![the curse of la llorona ending explained the curse of la llorona ending explained](https://www.hidefninja.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/the-curse-of-la-llorona-bluray-review-2019-04.png)
La Llorona is the CCU film with the most tangential connection to the rest of the franchise. But before all that, the sixth and least-heralded entry of the CCU arrives this weekend: The Curse of La Llorona. A third Annabelle film is arriving this summer a sequel to The Nun has been green-lit an additional spinoff called The Crooked Man, based on another ghoulish entity from The Conjuring 2, is being developed and of course, The Conjuring 3 is set for 2020. With these Conjuring films making so much money, additional sequels and spinoffs are on the way. And while the CCU films aren’t shattering box office records, the first five entries have grossed more than $1.5 billion worldwide on a total production cost just north of $100 million. The most expensive Conjuring movie, The Conjuring 2, had a production cost of $40 million-that’s less than half of what it cost to make Shazam!.
![the curse of la llorona ending explained the curse of la llorona ending explained](https://sabanerox.files.wordpress.com/2020/04/the-silence-of-the-marsh-ending-explained.png)
(Not to mention additional entries in the CCU, including a sequel, two spinoffs about a possessed doll named Annabelle, and a prequel about a demon nun who terrorizes the Warrens in the Conjuring sequel.) What works in horror movies’ favor is that they aren’t as reliant on giant, CGI-laden fights and skybeams, and can therefore be made on much smaller budgets. Superhero films are undoubtedly the current king of Hollywood, but the horror genre has been riding a wave of critical and commercial success in recent years thanks to films like Get Out, A Quiet Place, It, and Us. (I haven’t seen the franchise abbreviated as the CCU, but let’s just roll with that because it sounds good, and also for the sake of expediency.)Įxpanding the Conjuring-verse (see? CCU sounds way better) was a smart gambit by Warners. After The Conjuring-James Wan’s horror film very loosely based on the exploits of real paranormal investigators Ed and Lorraine Warren, played by Patrick Wilson and Vera Farmiga-made more than $300 million off a $20 million budget in 2013, the seeds were planted for what’s become the Conjuring Cinematic Universe. is finally turning a corner in its efforts to make the DC Extended Universe as well-received as its Marvel counterpart, the DCEU is not the only franchise the studio has been working on.